Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,372 |
| Posted: | | | | I just voted on a contribution for Shall We Dance? (786936-273298) where the submission is removing the common name of Mýa. His notes state this: Quote: Removal of Common Name, now that we have the Credit Lookup tool, we have 13 Titles, 24 versions for Mya Harrison, for Mýa we have ZERO titles and ZERO versions, so why this deserbved a Common name is more thabn I know. Oh, wait, IMDb strikes again, lol Now I may not be the smartest person here. Fact is I've been told (as have others) that I don't have the intelligence to comprehend many of the points raised here. I am however smart enough to know that it is impossible to have ZERO versions of something you are replacing. There has to be at least one version.... or there would be nothing to replace.... right? I checked and the credit lookup tool does not show any listings for Mýa. Is it not recognizing the "ý" somehow? As I note above there should be at least the one listing. To those of you from other countries, do you have trouble with the tool not providing results for names that are clearly listed? or is this some type of one of a kind glitch? Just curious. OT a bit: It does show Mya as having 56 titles, which IMO would be the common name, but that's another issue. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Well, Rick for one thing when you search on Mya, you get results which include Mya Harrison, Mýa Harrison and maybe Mya and Mýa (if there are any). But I'll wager you hadn't investigated that, not only that the Common Name that was chosen was NOT based on the Credit Lookup tool, it was based on IMDb data and the actor's website.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video | | | Last edited: by Winston Smith |
|
| T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,739 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: Well, Rick for one thing when you search on Mya, you get results which include Mya Harrison, Mýa Harrison and maybe Mya and Mýa (if there are any). Not true! A search in the "credit lookup" tool will render results for the EXACT name you searched for - taken from the "credited as" field. For instance, a search for "Mya" will NOT return the profiles in which she's listed as "Mya Harrison", etc. Why make these statements if you don't even know what you're talking about? | | | Last edited: by T!M |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 4,596 |
| Posted: | | | | A Credit Lookup results in 1 distinct title (Chicago) for Mýa Harrison. Whilst a Credit Lookup for Mya Harrison results in 4 distinct titles. The contributors statement of "13 Titles, 24 versions" is misleading as there are only 4 distinct titles but spread out over different localities. | | | My WebGenDVD online Collection |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,372 |
| Posted: | | | | OK. Figured it out. I guess it's not broken. Searching for Mýa shows no results yet there is a profile showing that credit. That profile uses the credited as function to show what is actually listed (Mya Harrison). Since there is a name listed in the credited as field the lookup ignores the name listed in the common name field. Makes sense. At least I got my answer. I simply misunderstood how the feature worked. Move along now.... nothin' to see here |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 906 |
| Posted: | | | | Just remember to look at the titles before you decide on a common name
For Mya, there are lots of profiles that are wrong. All those listed with [Hidden title] are porn movies, and the Mya in question here haven't played in any as far as I know.
In addition, there are a lot of profiles for the title Chicago that lists her as Mya. She is credited as Mýa Harrison in that movie. Shall We Dance is also listed when you search for Mya, and in that one she is credited as Mya Harrison.
So you can't just look at the numbers. You have to look at the titles behind the numbers too | | | The colour of her eyes, were the colour of insanity |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | reybr: I understand that, but I am not sure that there are many capable of that. Oh, I am so bad. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,203 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: reybr:
I understand that, but I am not sure that there are many capable of that. This is a very foolish statement to make, in a thread where you have demonstrated the fact, that you have no idea how the 'Credit Lookup' tool works. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,372 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting reybr: Quote: Just remember to look at the titles before you decide on a common name
For Mya, there are lots of profiles that are wrong. All those listed with [Hidden title] are porn movies, and the Mya in question here haven't played in any as far as I know.
In addition, there are a lot of profiles for the title Chicago that lists her as Mya. She is credited as Mýa Harrison in that movie. Shall We Dance is also listed when you search for Mya, and in that one she is credited as Mya Harrison.
So you can't just look at the numbers. You have to look at the titles behind the numbers too Except Ken has said to use it not to use it only if it is correct. (A position I don't agree with BTW). Mistakes or not we are to use it for the common name whatever the results OT: I see based on the quotes in a couple of threads there seems to be some more Skypocrisy about. In the Pirates thread Skip seems to be telling Tim to use the lookup tool as is for online and not use what he considers correct (even though he shows documentation). Here he seems to agree with Reybr that the lookup tool can be wrong and adds users aren't capable of sorting through the results to get what is truly the correct name. Make up your mind. Follow it as is or sort through it looking for mistakes. You cannot have it both ways, unless you are once again arguing simply for the sake of arguing. | | | Last edited: by lyonsden5 |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 906 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting lyonsden5: Quote:
Except Ken has said to use it not to use it only if it is correct. (A position I don't agree with BTW). Mistakes or not we are to use it for the common name whatever the results
But you can still use it together with other information you have. If you know she is credited one way in a movie but the tool says something else, you write that in the contribution notes. No reason to pick a common name you know is wrong. Just apply what you already know to the numbers. The tool is there to help you. It doesn't hold all the answers and Ken has never said to blindly trust it | | | The colour of her eyes, were the colour of insanity | | | Last edited: by reybr |
|
| T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,739 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting reybr: Quote: But you can still use it together with other information you have. If you know she is credited one way in a movie but the tool says something else, you write that in the contribution notes. No reason to pick a common name you know is wrong. Just apply what you already know to the numbers. The tool is there to help you. It doesn't hold all the answers and Ken has never said to blindly trust it There you go: the voice of reason! Put this man on a pedestal! |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,372 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote: Quoting reybr:
Quote: But you can still use it together with other information you have. If you know she is credited one way in a movie but the tool says something else, you write that in the contribution notes. No reason to pick a common name you know is wrong. Just apply what you already know to the numbers. The tool is there to help you. It doesn't hold all the answers and Ken has never said to blindly trust it There you go: the voice of reason! Put this man on a pedestal! i agree with both of you but unfortunately the rules don't. They say: Quote: To determine whether to enter the name directly as credited, or to use the "Credited As" field, use the Credit Lookup tool. Long live the neutral vote. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 906 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting lyonsden5: Quote:
i agree with both of you but unfortunately the rules don't.
They say:
Quote: To determine whether to enter the name directly as credited, or to use the "Credited As" field, use the Credit Lookup tool.
Long live the neutral vote. But they don't tell you how to interpret the result from the tool. It's the result from the tool I'm questioning. If you know the result is false, you can write that. (Or you can change all the profiles you know have the wrong credited as name, so that the tool reports everything correctly... But that isn't exactly a small job) Everything isn't black and white | | | The colour of her eyes, were the colour of insanity | | | Last edited: by reybr |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | I posted a link to Ken clarifying on a couple of threads today... where he told a user it was correct to use what was mostly credited with the look-up tool. So between the rules and his statement there I have to say what needs to be done is use the outcome of the tool no matter what the results... but at the same time... we all need to get busy on getting all our profiles correct so that the tool will mean the right info.
And I know this will mean we have to change some common names for some people more then once... but that is to be expected anyway. | | | Pete |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 906 |
| Posted: | | | | The quote you posted was this
"In general, yes. There will be cases that require a bit more perusing to make sure there aren't false matches."
Note the part about the false matches. | | | The colour of her eyes, were the colour of insanity |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | It was never clarified that I could find... but it seems to be mostly believe that he meant 2 people with the same name... which will also be straightened out once we get all the needed Birth Years in for those.
I do think the key to getting it right... since we do need to use most credited from the look-up tool.... is to get as much corrected profiles in as possible... as soon as possible. | | | Pete |
|