Now i know why the forums seemed a little quiet this weekend.  Everyone was out there linking like a bunch of mad fools. 

Those numbers at the top are amazing, especially considering each number represents a unique URL.

Quoting skipnet50:

Quote:
Well...now we know where all the dvdpascher.com entries came from...why am I not surprised.

Skip

'Twasn't me.

What you do is to find a movie that has the most alternate profiles for it and then submit a bajillion valid links for it.

You win!

Quoting Staid S Barr:

Quote:
I count a total of 35,460 for the top 50 contributors, which is already more than the total number of link urls.
Probably some correction work, and some duplications, but it suggests that 50 people do 99.9% of the work.
Would the same be true for contributions? And forum posts?

That number is probably close for forum posts, but not for profile contributions.
I see many names on contributions, they seldom post to the forum.
And it doesn't mean that don't read the forum occasionally.

Quoting SpikeX:

Quote:
Is there any chance of having a similar page for profile and image contributions?

????????

Skip

Quoting Ken Cole:

Quote:
A few more changes for links:
- Clicking the cover image in the liink submission page will open a google search to assist
- Cover images in the Recent Purchases section of user profile pages now go to the link page for the profile
- Cover images embedded in the forums now go to the link page for the profile

Wouldn't it be nice if you would go to the link page if you double clicked on the cover image of the view contributors window or maybe add a "View profile links" line in that same window?

Quoting pauls42:

Quote:
Quoting SpikeX:

Quote:
Now there's a page for who's contributed how many links, how about a page for who's contributed how many images and another for how many profile contributions.

In other words; top image and profile contributors.

There must a be count kept as this is displayed on our user profiles.

the trouble wth having a page like you describe for profile contributions is that it could encourage idiots to make crap contributions in order to get on 'the' list.

On this thread,
I proposed a new system for contributions:

One rule : no third party data.
Present rules become guides.

Anonymous contribution
Anonymous votes : Yes, the contribution is worth being put in the database  No, it is not.

The majority and screeners decide.

Then:
+1 point per accepted contribution
-1 point per refused contribution

Ken gives the list of best contributors.

People who make interesting work for the database will be top of the list. Pingpongers will be bottom of the list...

-------

The system for submitting links is not so far from that, anonymous, with a correct/non correct vote and a top list.

You have just to add the negative point to avoid "idiots to make crap contributions".

PS. This idea owned me several red arrows when I posted it