|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 Previous Next
|
Common name: George 'Buck' Flower |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
| T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,739 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Martin_Zuidervliet: Quote: Anyway, I now know any poll is useless to persuade Ken. It's just usefull for your own decisions or perhaps to persuade other users. That's how I (mostly) use them as well: they're an interesting way to gauge opinion on a subject. When I'm voting no because of a certain issue, a poll may show that everyone agrees with me, that it's a grey area, or that I stand completely alone on any given subject. In the latter case, that might convince me to change my stance on the subject, or at least my vote. I also feel polls remain an interesting way for Ken to keep up to speed about "hot issues" in the community. Of course, he can use that information any way he wants to. I should also point out that the vast, and mostly rather silent, majority of the users never visits the forums - and given the current state of affairs here, who can blame 'em? Back on topic, I stil feel pretty confident that the number of actual George 'Buck' Flower credits out there is surprisingly close to zero, and I would rather focus on correcting more profiles with the names actually used on-screen instead of starting to use George 'Buck' Flower as a "common name". No matter what the "lookup tool" returns today, I'm absolutely sure that when all profiles are "as credited", George 'Buck' Flower will NOT emerge as the most-credited form. It may turn out to be Buck Flower, or it may be George "Buck" Flower, but it certainly won't be George 'Buck' Flower. Again: I'll be glad to take on any bets on the matter. |
| Registered: August 22, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,807 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote: The single quotation marks are indeed a dead giveaway that the majority of the data as returned by the credit lookup tool was lifted straight from IMDb. Even if so, the problem lies in the wrong contributions (that should be corrected), not in the Credit Lookup Tool (which is as good as the data it relies on). I think the road to go is: do use the Credit Lookup Tool, but also do correct the wrong credits in the database, so that the CLT will provide "better" results. Edit: Unless Ken decides some form of standardization, but that's up to him. | | | -- Enry | | | Last edited: by White Pongo, Jr. |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,739 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting EnryWiki: Quote: Quoting T!M:
Quote: The single quotation marks are indeed a dead giveaway that the majority of the data as returned by the credit lookup tool was lifted straight from IMDb.
Even if so, the problem lies in the wrong contributions (that should be corrected), not in the Credit Lookup Tool (which is as good as the data it relies on). I think the road to go is: do use the Credit Lookup Tool, but also do correct the wrong credits in the database, so that the CLT will provide "better" results. That I of course absolutely agree with. When making these corrections, though, I would personally see little use in adding a "common name" of George 'Buck' Flower to each and every profile that I corrected, because I'd know full well that it was wrong. True, you could do so using the "lookup tool" as an argument, but it only creates more work in the long run. Again, I'm not saying you're not ALLOWED to do so, but since this is so obvious, I just think it would be silly. |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 555 |
| Posted: | | | | As for George "Buck" Flower, maybe it's best to wait a while before choosing a common name for contributions, and just keep it local for the time being. I will at least go through my collection and check how he is actually credited in the various movies, and then submit the correct cast credits for the profiles I see are incorrect using the credit lookup tool. |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: | | | | It's slightly off-topic but to address Martin's issue - I would class missing accents as a spelling mistake, and in all other cases we would use "credited as" to show spelling mistakes in names, with the common name preserving the correct spelling, accents included. For example, even if it was the most common entry, I'd hate to think that Ken would agree with the use of "John Wain" as a common name. As to the topic in hand, taking a quick look in the IMDB page, it seems that the majority of his credits are for "Buck Flower" (I didn't count so may be wrong). If that is true, then I'd say that was his common name. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | but Tim... the rules don't say you are allowed to... it says to use it. Will it change once it all gets in... probably so... but that is how the rules tells us to do it. Rules Quote: Quote: Use the "Credited As" field where the person's name differs from the credited name.
To determine whether to enter the name directly as credited, or to use the "Credited As" field, use the Credit Lookup tool. I would imagine lots of common names will change over time since we are going with most commonly credited... so I don't see that it will almost certainly (No one knows for sure) change be a reason for not using it... especially when the rules tells us to use it. There is a difference between being allowed and being told to do something (in the rules). | | | Pete |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,739 |
| Posted: | | | | That's okay, Pete, I understand what you're saying. I'm just saying that I couldn't possibly justify working that way. FYI: I put an enormous amount of work into DVD Profiler. For every common name I contribute, I'll do the necessary research, I'll check a large number of profiles, and then I'll decide on a common name. I will then start using that common name, even if there's no majority in the "credit lookup tool" yet - note that this is essentially the case each and every time I settle on a different common name than IMDb did. Do I make mistakes? Sure, there are bound to be, but I do my best to correct them A.S.A.P. Generally speaking, I find my approach a lot better (and causing fewer pointless updates) than blindly inserting the IMDb-name as "common name" for about every single actor, only to have to change them all again later on. Especially these examples with the single quotation marks are a very obvious example of this. So that's my method. I daresay the end result is exactly the same - we just have a different way of getting there. I'm not asking for your approval: if you don't like the way I work, feel free to vote against my updates whenever you see them, or better yet: do the work yourself.
IMHO, the bottom line is that all this talk is very nice, but we need to get to work. With every approved cast/crew update, the "credit lookup tool" results will improve. I'm not one to boast, but I just checked, and I now have 5.671 approved contributions under my belt. I'd say I'm doing my share... Are you? | | | Last edited: by T!M |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | As long as it don't match what comes from the look-up tool here on the site I will have to vote no because of what both the rules and Ken has said. As the rules tells us to use it... and Ken clarified to use it unless you can document that it is wrong... and it definitely takes more then that is the name imdb uses to document it is wrong... So that is what I will follow for both voting and contributing...
I may not be in the thousands yet... but I definitely do my share of conrtibutions (well over 600 profiles alone)... as I am sure you look and saw... whether you feel it is my fair share or not is up to you.... and I personally don't really care if you do feel it is my fair share or not.
And I have been working on cast lists... especially after Ken's comments yesterday... and have gone through many profiles and updated several that was wrong already since his comment.. as well as other contributions I have made. | | | Pete |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | Posts: 1,982 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote: Could you please tell us which thirteen profiles these are? And are you sure your profiles are "as credited"? Not trying to be funny - I'm seriously interested. In my experience, single quotation marks are only very rarely used in actual film credits, so I'd be interested to know whether you really have thirteen profiles actually using this form of the name on-screen. I've check all the screen credit of those profile after the PM and this is what you see on the screen credit : Back to the future : Buck Flower Back to the future 2 : Buck Flower Bigfoot Terror : George Buck Flower Cheerleader camp : Buck Flower Deep jaws/The dicktator (Special edition) : C.D. Lefleur The dirty mind of young sally/Teenage bride (Special edition) : C.D. LaFleure The Godson/Below the belt (Special edition) : Buck Flower Ilsa she wolf of the SS : C.D. Lafleuer Ilsa harem keeper of the oil sheiks : C.D. Lafleur The fog : George "Buck" Flower Maniac cop : George "Buck" Flower They live : George "Buck" Flower They live (Zone 2) : George "Buck" Flower As you could see George 'Buck' Flower is nowhere on the screen credit, but the "credited as" is for that. My choice is a personal preference, but if you have to select a common name it's better to go for George "Buck" Flower than Buck Flower since the last option is not his name. |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,739 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Addicted2DVD: Quote: As long as it don't match what comes from the look-up tool here on the site I will have to vote no because of what both the rules and Ken has said. As the rules tells us to use it... and Ken clarified to use it unless you can document that it is wrong... and it definitely takes more then that is the name imdb uses to document it is wrong... So that is what I will follow for both voting and contributing... Which is of course absolutely fine, as I already said. I'll just work on other profiles... Quote: I may not be in the thousands yet... but I definitely do my share of conrtibutions (well over 600 profiles alone)... as I am sure you look and saw... whether you feel it is my fair share or not is up to you.... and I personally don't really care if you do feel it is my fair share or not. No, I didn't bother to check, and I certainly don't intend to pass judgement. I seriously appreciate anyone's effort. It's just that I'm getting a bit tired of all this talking about the way to get there, which IMHO is largely irrelevant. In the end, it's important that as many profiles as possible get corrected to show the actual on-screen name in the "credited as" field. At the moment, when the database still contains about 80% IMDb-data, I daresay that having the correct data in the "credited as" field is even more important than having the correct data in the (common) "name" field - as the latter is data that theoretically can only be definitively established when all profiles have been corrected. Quote: And I have been working on cast lists... especially after Ken's comments yesterday... and have gone through many profiles and updated several that was wrong already since his comment.. as well as other contributions I have made. Great! | | | Last edited: by T!M |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,739 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting AESP_pres: Quote: Quoting T!M:
Quote: Could you please tell us which thirteen profiles these are? And are you sure your profiles are "as credited"? Not trying to be funny - I'm seriously interested. In my experience, single quotation marks are only very rarely used in actual film credits, so I'd be interested to know whether you really have thirteen profiles actually using this form of the name on-screen.
I've check all the screen credit of those profile after the PM and this is what you see on the screen credit :
Back to the future : Buck Flower Back to the future 2 : Buck Flower Bigfoot Terror : George Buck Flower Cheerleader camp : Buck Flower Deep jaws/The dicktator (Special edition) : C.D. Lefleur The dirty mind of young sally/Teenage bride (Special edition) : C.D. LaFleure The Godson/Below the belt (Special edition) : Buck Flower Ilsa she wolf of the SS : C.D. Lafleuer Ilsa harem keeper of the oil sheiks : C.D. Lafleur The fog : George "Buck" Flower Maniac cop : George "Buck" Flower They live : George "Buck" Flower They live (Zone 2) : George "Buck" Flower
As you could see George 'Buck' Flower is nowhere on the screen credit, but the "credited as" is for that. My choice is a personal preference, but if you have to select a common name it's better to go for George "Buck" Flower than Buck Flower since the last option is not his name. Thank you for bothering to check on all these. As I expected, George "Buck" Flower would seem to be the mostly used form, although it could still turn out to be just Buck Flower. At any rate - no surprise there - there's not a single George 'Buck' Flower credit. Anyone still up for correcting a load of his credits with George 'Buck' Flower as "common name", just because the credit lookup tool incorrectly says it's the most credited form? Please - use a bit of common sense, people. | | | Last edited: by T!M |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Tim: You found it, why are you asking someone else to do it. Get to it, bud. Astounding. You find it, you bring it up and start a poll, then ask someone else to do the work. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,739 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: Tim:
You found it, why are you asking someone else to do it. Get to it, bud. Astounding. You find it, you bring it up and start a poll, then ask someone else to do the work.
Skip Have you actually read anything I've been saying here? You are now accusing me of not doing the work? Trust me, I am! Take a deep breath, and try reading some of these posts for a change, instead of just picking up two or three words and firing off another rant... | | | Last edited: by T!M |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | once again... my common sense tells me to do it as Ken wants it done... which is go by the look-up tool unless you can DOCUMENT that the tool is wrong... and he himself said best way is by correcting the profiles.
showing that 13 is in there wrong per the credits is a good start... but when it comes that he is credited in over 200 titles (by searching all variations of his name)... that isn't enough to prove that it couldn't still happen.
And once again... I have no problem with having to go back and change the common name later... as this will most likely have to be done anyway from time to time with any actor. | | | Pete |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | BTW, Tim, I am sure you are totally that the use of 'Buck"(single quotes) is VERY rare, it does happen. But the use of single quotes is common SOMEWHERE.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,203 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: Tim:
You found it, why are you asking someone else to do it. Get to it, bud. Astounding. You find it, you bring it up and start a poll, then ask someone else to do the work.
Skip You really need to learn how to read before you stick your nose into something. Behemot is the one that 'found it', Behemot is the one who brought it up and Behemot is the one who started the poll. All T!M did was offer his opinion on the subject. As for 'doing the work'...last time I checked, 5677 was more than 3142. Edit: I should add that I have no problem with what Behemot did. The only way to resolve some of these is to have a discussion. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar | | | Last edited: by TheMadMartian |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|