| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 |  Posts: 1,777 |
| | Posted: | | | | I guess I would have to agree that 2.40 should be added since I've demonstrated that I thought it was already in the list!  |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 3,436 |
| | Posted: | | | | I'd like to see 2.40 as a item on the dropdown as well. | | | Achim [諾亞信； Ya-Shin//Nuo], a German in Taiwan.
Registered: May 29, 2000 (at InterVocative) |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 1,414 |
| | Posted: | | | | Not at the expense of 2.20:1 though. That's a legitimate format that should stay (see Oklahoma! Todd-AO version above--there are others in VistaVision format too). Just add 2.40:1. | | | | "This movie has warped my fragile little mind." |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | I would frankly call this a VERY low prority issue, given that we can edit and add whatever aspect ratio we need to. There are things that I think are a whole lot more important to the program than this, such as the ability to add real italics and bold or whatever (not colors) to Overviews.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 3,321 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote:
I would frankly call this a VERY low prority issue, given that we can edit and add whatever aspect ratio we need to. There are things that I think are a whole lot more important to the program than this, such as the ability to add real italics and bold or whatever (not colors) to Overviews.
Skip I have to agree with Skip. I would personally consider this a very low priority. There are a lot of other things I'd love to see addressed first. On the other hand, this seems like something that would take Ken about 30 seconds to add. So if that assumption is true, then I would support the change. If it involves a lot of his time, then count me out. | | | Get the CSVExport and Database Query plug-ins here.
Create fake parent profiles to organize your collection. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,394 |
| | Posted: | | | | I'll go along with Mark going along with Skip on this about the priority issue. I also agree with Mark that it would probably not take much time to add to the aspect ratio drop down - as opposed to adding formatting codes to the Overview section. This is the same argument used by those who want additional languages added.
But even if it's a simple change (adding more ratios) maybe it's not worth releasing a new build of Profiler for just the easy-to-remedy stuff -- and Ken is going to bundle them with a more comprehensive build? Or is that just wishful thinking on my part? | | | Another Ken (not Ken Cole)
Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges.
DVD Profiler user since June 15, 2001 |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 |  Posts: 2,366 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting GSyren: Quote:
Quoting Erik:
Quote:
Arguing and opinions on redundancy aside, does everyone at least agree that "2.40:1" should be added?
As a 'replacement' for the rarely-used 2.20 for instance...
I have no problem with that. Me neither. | | | Martin Zuidervliet
DVD Profiler Nederlands |
|
  | Erik | | It's a strange world. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 422 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting gardibolt: Quote:
Not at the expense of 2.20:1 though. That's a legitimate format that should stay (see Oklahoma! Todd-AO version above--there are others in VistaVision format too). Just add 2.40:1. That's fair enough, of course. Quoting Mark Harrison: Quote:
I have to agree with Skip. I would personally consider this a very low priority. There are a lot of other things I'd love to see addressed first. I have read (and suggested a few of) the "high priority" features, but since those are in limbo or possibly too involved to include at this time I figured I'd go with a smaller priority request. There's a reason I plugged HD audio and Blu-ray regions in the first post, I consider those much more important.  Major changes/additions in the crew credits as well, but anyhoo... | | | Erik
"Has it ever occurred to you, man, that given the nature of all this new stuff, that, uh, instead of running around blaming me, that this whole thing might just be, not, you know, not just such a simple, but uh - you know?" -- The Dude, The Big Lebowski
 |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Erik: The list of priority issues, IMNHO  , is way too long. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 5,918 |
| | Posted: | | | | It's not merely a list of priorities, the time it takes to implement plays a factor too. If it's simply a matter of editing a row in a table, that could take a couple minutes.
As a programmer myself, I've put in a lot of lower priority issues before higher ones simply because the time it took to implement them was a fraction of the time. |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 5,715 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Erik: Quote:
Arguing and opinions on redundancy aside, does everyone at least agree that "2.40:1" should be added?
As a 'replacement' for the rarely-used 2.20 for instance... I'd like to see the "correct" 2,39:1 implemented instead... AA | | | | Complete list of Common Names • A good point for starting with Headshots (and v11.1) |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,394 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Dr. Killpatient: Quote:
It's not merely a list of priorities, the time it takes to implement plays a factor too. If it's simply a matter of editing a row in a table, that could take a couple minutes.
As a programmer myself, I've put in a lot of lower priority issues before higher ones simply because the time it took to implement them was a fraction of the time. But did you roll out an interim build with those lower priority issues fixed or did you wait and include them in a more complete version? | | | Another Ken (not Ken Cole)
Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges.
DVD Profiler user since June 15, 2001 |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,918 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting kdh1949: Quote:
But did you roll out an interim build with those lower priority issues fixed or did you wait and include them in a more complete version? Depends on how easy it is to roll out the changes. In the web world, changes can be pushed out whenever the programmer wishes. I've seen updates being pushed out to invelos.com today and yesterday morning. Now with a program such as the desktop app, it's a little bit different. You can't push out a new release every day because it requires the user to do something to see the new stuff. In that situation, you would see a tendency to defer release until you have either a lot of changes that you feel would be beneficial to everyone or a a couple big fixes that you also feel would be beneficial to everyone. |
|
| Erik | | It's a strange world. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 422 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote:
Erik:
The list of priority issues, IMNHO , is way too long.
Skip You ain't kiddin'  Quoting AiAustria: Quote:
I'd like to see the "correct" 2,39:1 implemented instead... Yeah... although as people have pointed out, they're all very close, and 2.39, while it indeed is totally accurate, is less used than 2.40. | | | Erik
"Has it ever occurred to you, man, that given the nature of all this new stuff, that, uh, instead of running around blaming me, that this whole thing might just be, not, you know, not just such a simple, but uh - you know?" -- The Dude, The Big Lebowski
|
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,394 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Dr. Killpatient: Quote:
Quoting kdh1949:
Quote:
I've seen updates being pushed out to invelos.com today and yesterday morning. Now with a program such as the desktop app, it's a little bit different. You can't push out a new release every day because it requires the user to do something to see the new stuff. In that situation, you would see a tendency to defer release until you have either a lot of changes that you feel would be beneficial to everyone or a a couple big fixes that you also feel would be beneficial to everyone.
Weren't most of those "immediate" changes done to correct major errors in the beta test phase? I understand the need to push out fixes quickly, but adding a few more items to a pull down list isn't as important as correcting some malfunctioning code, IMHO. | | | Another Ken (not Ken Cole)
Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges.
DVD Profiler user since June 15, 2001 |
|