Quoting skipnet50:

Quote:
What a 3waste of time and energy, ahve fun, children.

Skip

I completely agree - this whole thread was a complete waste of time. Now, lets remember how it all started, and learn a lesson from that! 

Does this mean we're not going to play anymore? 

Don't worry, he has said it at least 20 times before, along with quitting the forum. It never lasts more than a week, generally no more than a day. 

Quoting Rifter:

Quote:
A million lemmings going over a cliff are all on the same page, too.  But, they're all just as dead...

Can you explain to us lemmings why we need disc number and disc side labels inserted into the cast for series of 3-6 episodes in length? Have you started doing this in any of your disc level profiles of the same length?

Quoting m.cellophane:

Quote:
Quoting Rifter:

Quote:
A million lemmings going over a cliff are all on the same page, too.  But, they're all just as dead...

Can you explain to us lemmings why we need disc number and disc side labels inserted into the cast for series of 3-6 episodes in length? Have you started doing this in any of your disc level profiles of the same length?

I have already tried that, james and predictably you don't get it sooooo...................

BTW for the record I was being facetious about the Edition issue, even though I don't agree with it, to revisit it now would require the undoing of a lot of work. And you obviously don't comprehend the similarity in the issue, and I no longer have the time, energy or desire to engage in expalnations with people who either have no desire to get it or lack the ability to get it. I don't know which it is, nor is of any relevance to me any longer.

Skip

Quoting m.cellophane:

Quote:
Quoting skipnet50:

Quote:
I have already tried that, james and predictably you don't get it sooooo...................

BTW for the record I was being facetious about the Edition issue, even though I don't agree with it, to revisit it now would require the undoing of a lot of work. And you obviously don't comprehend the similarity in the issue, and I no longer have the time, energy or desire to engage in expalnations with people who either have no desire to get it or lack the ability to get it. I don't know which it is, nor is of any relevance to me any longer.

Skip

My question was addressed to John. Since your comments could be Skip or Contra-Skip  , I don't know what to say.    Since you are attempting to mix the topics of appropriate edition names with the topic of disc dividers in cast and crew, this must be Contra-Skip, so I'll pass. 

My lemming reference was to illustrate that being all on the same page doesn't mean diddly, because you can still be wrong whether its one or one thousand.

Quoting Rifter:

Quote:
My lemming reference was to illustrate that being all on the same page doesn't mean diddly, because you can still be wrong whether its one or one thousand.

Okey dokey.  It's currently 68 on my side of the equation. I can think of 3 people that I PM on a regular basis, so it's not like I coordinated the vote or anything... 

Quoting Rifter:

Quote:
Quoting m.cellophane:

Quote:
Quoting Rifter:

Quote:
A million lemmings going over a cliff are all on the same page, too.  But, they're all just as dead...

Can you explain to us lemmings why we need disc number and disc side labels inserted into the cast for series of 3-6 episodes in length? Have you started doing this in any of your disc level profiles of the same length?

I had a couple of ideas for using dividers that you guys ripped to shreds just like you're doing to Skip.  I don't particularly like dividers, per se, but I think they can be made more useful than what you all want to allow.

I don't recall the uses for dividers that "my guys" ripped to shreds, but I'd seriously like to know what dividers you use in your personal disc-level profiles?

Quoting skipnet50:

Quote:
I have already tried that, james and predictably you don't get it sooooo...................

BTW for the record I was being facetious about the Edition issue, even though I don't agree with it, to revisit it now would require the undoing of a lot of work. And you obviously don't comprehend the similarity in the issue, and I no longer have the time, energy or desire to engage in expalnations with people who either have no desire to get it or lack the ability to get it. I don't know which it is, nor is of any relevance to me any longer.

Skip

You are confusing 'not getting it' with 'not agreeing with you'.  Just because we don't agree doesn't mean we don't get it.  The problem with your stance is you are starting from the false assumption that you are correct and everybody else is wrong.  I don't happen to agree with that stance.  But that's just me...er...us?