Or how about all three??  Contributed UPC code 025192057229  which is the 1948 Universal Picture of Bud Abbott and Lou Costello Meets Frankenstein .. Why all the negatives here??:

Sorry to play devils advocate, but Chaney & Lugosi do not play dual roles in this film: Talbot sometimes becomes A wolfman, Dracula gives a false name
No to title change. It's Abbott and Costello. Bud & Lou are smaller font. Emphasis on Abbott & Costello.
I agree  re Chaney & Lugosi
agree with others
"technically" right, but i agree with 8ballMax.

Do these pictures paint a differant picture????.. ( I could have scanned the disc as well as it is also reads the Title as Bud Abbott and Lou Costello Meet Frankenstein  ( all same sized fonts) as screen shot shows) :

By the new rules title must be 'Bud Abbott and Lou Costello Meet Frankenstein'

It is clear on the rear cover where indicated by Ken to take the title from

Quoting mdnitoil:

Quote:
I'm indifferent towards the title.  I believe you are technically correct so I was compelled to vote for it, but it's not what I'll be keeping locally.  The comments regarding roles are valid.  In the film, Lugosi offers a false name, but he wasn't playing two different roles.  He's trying to keep a low profile.  Introducing himself as Dracula would sort of blow his cover.  Neither was Chaney playing two different roles.  Lawrence Talbot is the wolfman.  Anybody who's seen the Universal Wolfman movies would know that.  In both cases, these aren't different characters, but rather the same character in different circumstances.

So you are saying that we should take the cast credits by what is spoken in the script and not what is in the cast titles??  I know now what it is you are saying,, but are we not to take what is in the credits and not scripted spoken words?? 

Based on the cover and screen cap, the title should be: Bud Abbott and Lou Costello Meet Frankenstein.

As for the roles, you can't argue with the credits.  It doesn't matter what the characters are called in the film.  It only matters how they are credited.

I've been meaning to ask, why the strangely angled cover?  The lines at the top of my cover are clearly horizontal but you've got the whole thing cocked by a few degrees.  It's not that big a deal and I'm glad you removed that image from your original submission.  I was just curious.

Weird, the one on my profile might be off a touch, buy yours is off by a mile.  I wonder how we got out of sync?

Quoting GSyren:

Quote:
Quoting Unicus69:

Quote:
Based on the cover and screen cap, the title should be: Bud Abbott and Lou Costello Meet Frankenstein.

However, for our purposes, what's on the cover is what counts primarily, and that is clearly "Bud Abbott and Lou Costello Meet Frankenstein".

You would think so,, but my votes so far are 2 for and 11 against..,,  I bet if 8ballmax switched his vote,, his followers would change as well..

Where's Skip when I need him?? 
Oh yeah..,,  He doesn't have this title in his vast library..     

So you and the others are saying then that Lon Chaney Never had his makeup on for a quick screen appearance of the Wolfman?? or that Bela Lugosi never played Dr. Lajos in the film ?? The screen credits don't say,, but we know its there there . so therefore it is called UNCREDITED ... 

Those uncredited roles ARE already in the data  base already., I just wanted to make the cast/screen roles exactly as they are credited  in the closing credit roll.. 
( I did leave a snapshot of that frame for all to see.. )

Perhaps you would like to have both uncredited roles removed then??  I don't question the  97 uncredited munchkins in Wizard of OZ  why are you so much against these two names.. ?? 

I don't get it ..