| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 16, 2007 |  Posts: 9 |
| | Posted: | | | | Hey Guys
I submitted a new entry for Stargate Atlantis - 321337 088853
the entry was declined saying - Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions.
The only one is see contributed is - 321337 088846
There is a slimline version which is the one i was trying to contribute and a the current contribution is in larger case |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 5,918 |
| | Posted: | | | | If you copied the data from another profile, you need to specify that in the notes. |
|
| Registered: March 19, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 6,018 |
| | Posted: | | | | More in general, nowadays you need to specify where you got the data in your new entry from. Especially if you include cast and crew credits without mentioning where you got them (e.g. "taken from opening and end credits"), your contribution will be declined.
Here's an example of my own contribution notes for a recent new contribution I did, which got accepted:
"New contribution. All data taken from disc. All cast and crew credits taken from the film's opening and end credits. Video and audio formats and running time verified using PowerDVD. Layer info and region coding verified using DVDInfoPro."
In your case, if you copied the data from the larger case profile (assuming that's the only difference between the two discs), contribution notes along the lines of "All data copied from approved profile ..... (list UPC). Disc ID verified to be identical using ...." should work as well.
Good luck recontributing, Paul! | | | | Last edited: by dee1959jay |
|
| Registered: August 22, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 1,807 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting dee1959jay: Quote:
Here's an example of my own contribution notes for a recent new contribution I did, which got accepted Here's an example of mine, approved as well In Good Company EAN 8-032807-006819  Quoting my contribution note Quote:
Uncredited Malcolm McDowell can be seen from minute 82 through 87. Movie reviews reporting his cameo http://www.altfg.com/blog/film-reviews/in-good-company-paul-weitz-quaid-grace/ " Malcolm McDowell in a cameo as a Rupert Murdoch-ish corporate ogre...." www.popentertainment.com/ingoodcompany.htm "uncredited Malcolm McDowell in a funny cameo. ... www.reelviews.net/movies/i/in_good.html "an uncredited Malcolm McDowell (as Teddy K., the mogul of corporation-gobbling..." *CAST film credits. Common Name Philip / Baker / Hall see links in http://www.lopek.com/cndatabase/database.php?cni=h Common Names "Katherine Ellis" "Francesca Roberts" according to Credit Lookup *CREW: film credits. Common Name "Eric Lindemann" per Credit Lookup. *VIDEO Format by cap measurament. *AUDIO: DVDfabDecrypter *RUN TIME: PowerDVD *FEATURES and SUBT.: DVD menu *REGION: NeroInfoTool *OVERVIEW, RATING: back cover *SCANS: done by me | | | | -- Enry | | | | Last edited: by White Pongo, Jr. |
|
| Registered: March 29, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 4,479 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting EnryWiki: Quote:
Quoting my contribution note
Quote:
Uncredited Malcolm McDowell can be seen from minute 82 through 87. Movie reviews reporting his cameo http://www.altfg.com/blog/film-reviews/in-good-company-paul-weitz-quaid-grace/ " Malcolm McDowell in a cameo as a Rupert Murdoch-ish corporate ogre...." www.popentertainment.com/ingoodcompany.htm "uncredited Malcolm McDowell in a funny cameo. ... www.reelviews.net/movies/i/in_good.html "an uncredited Malcolm McDowell (as Teddy K., the mogul of corporation-gobbling..." *CAST film credits. Common Name Philip / Baker / Hall see links in http://www.lopek.com/cndatabase/database.php?cni=h Common Names "Katherine Ellis" "Francesca Roberts" according to Credit Lookup *CREW: film credits. Common Name "Eric Lindemann" per Credit Lookup. *VIDEO Format by cap measurament. *AUDIO: DVDfabDecrypter *RUN TIME: PowerDVD *FEATURES and SUBT.: DVD menu *REGION: NeroInfoTool *OVERVIEW, RATING: back cover *SCANS: done by me If you wanted to demonstrate at what point contributions rules may make normal people (I mean people that are not totally dedicated to this type of hobby) fly away from contributing, I give you 20/20...  | | | | Images from movies |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 4,596 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting surfeur51: Quote:
If you wanted to demonstrate at what point contributions rules may make normal people (I mean people that are not totally dedicated to this type of hobby) fly away from contributing, I give you 20/20...  This is getting old | | | | My WebGenDVD online Collection |
|
| Registered: March 29, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 4,479 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting 8ballMax: Quote:
This is getting old Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah... | | | | Images from movies |
|
  | Berak | | Bibamus morieundum est! |
| Registered: May 10, 2007 |  Posts: 1,059 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting surfeur51: Quote:
Quoting 8ballMax:
Quote:
This is getting old
Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah... Get a life dude - either start contributing or stay away from the forums with your consistent nagging about your personal view of the rules, and how they scare "ordinary" people away because they don't fit your preference.. FFS - you nag like an old hag on her deathbed!! | | | Berak
It's better to burn out than to fade away!
True love conquers all! |
|
| Registered: March 29, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 4,479 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Berak: Quote:
you nag like an old hag on her deathbed!! You are too kind...  | | | | Images from movies |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | What Berak said, Yves, it has long since gotten old. We all know your position and your belief thant you and you alone know what is best....you do know what is best...fro YOU. And nobody cares. But I know you won't listen to me.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Registered: March 19, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 6,018 |
| | Posted: | | | | IMHO none of this is helping Paul to do new contributions.
What I could add to my original post: if you're including uncredited cast in your contribution, make sure you thoroughly document where you got the information from (as shown by EnryWiki in his example).
And as the same user mentioned: there is something called a Credit Lookup tool for cases in which the same actor is credited under different names in different films. You can then use the "common name" and use the "Credited as" feature to show how he/she is credited in the particular film you're doing a contribution on.
However, if you can't or won't spend the amount of time needed to research uncredited cast and/or common names, it would be perfectly OK to just use the credits as they are in the actual film. Just avoid third-party sources like IMDb. | | | | Last edited: by dee1959jay |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 1,279 |
| | Posted: | | | | Having looked at the notes it's not surprising it's been declined. You simply state that it's a "new entry", but as your online collection shows some cast listed, the SRP, release date audio etc... you need to provide more details as to where you've taken the info from.
I would suggest you don't need as much detail as EnryWiki's notes, I certainly don't enter notes that long for a standard new submission and usually have little trouble with profiles being accepted. | | | | IVS Registered: January 2, 2002 | | | | Last edited: by Lithurge |
|