Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3 4  Previous   Next
country of origin help.
Author Message
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantBattling Butler
Registered: March 13, 2007
Posts: 811
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Dvdjon:
Quote:
Hello all.

There is one person who are trying to change lotr fellowship of the ring ectended UK version from usa to new zealand as country of origin. The person claims this is a new zealand picture. I claim it is an american movie made in new zealand and has woted no what do you guys think?



Skip Alert!
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantDvdjon
Ministry of silly walks
Registered: July 15, 2007
Norway Posts: 159
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Battling Butler:
Quote:
Quoting Dvdjon:
Quote:
Hello all.

There is one person who are trying to change lotr fellowship of the ring ectended UK version from usa to new zealand as country of origin. The person claims this is a new zealand picture. I claim it is an american movie made in new zealand and has woted no what do you guys think?



Skip Alert!


Skip alert right back atcha. I was stupid and tought one could ask legitimate questions here without getting stupid remarks (and insulting to skip). Grow up.  Anyways to the point:

Im still not convinced but i will bend to the general opinion and that was why I asked the question. My personal opinion and clearly that of AFI is that new line is the primary production company and not wingnut films. But I will vote yes for the nz so go right ahead and recintribute it if it hasent allready gone trough. Oh and someone should proparbly change the frighteners hd dvd too 
Jon has recently watched these movies:
 Last edited: by Dvdjon
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributornorthbloke
Registered: March 15, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 5,459
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Dvdjon:
Quote:
My personal opinion and clearly that of AFI is that new line is the primary production company and not wingnut films. But I will vote yes for the nz so go right ahead and recintribute it if it hasent allready gone trough. Oh and someone should proparbly change the frighteners hd dvd too 

But according to what you said, the AFI don't look at the primary production company, they look for a significant creative/production input - that doesn't even mean majority, it could be as little as 10-20%, and they could still class that as significant. They also take into account where the cast, crew and support staff are from.
Also in this case New Line aren't acting as production company, but as film studio/distributor. That's why they get the "presents" credit and Wingnut get the "a ... production" credit.
 Last edited: by northbloke
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantDvdjon
Ministry of silly walks
Registered: July 15, 2007
Norway Posts: 159
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
it boils down to simple math... no way in hell that the very small company wingnut payed up for 80% of allmost $300 millions. sorry they made like 10 millions on frghteners. Thats why they needed new line. but who cares the only 100% correct thing is to have 2 CoO and we cant have that. So Ill yield and let you guys deside ill vote yes on nz. in short ill give up
Jon has recently watched these movies:
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar Contributorschizzzo
Registered: March 20, 2007
Germany Posts: 78
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Dvdjon:
Quote:
the only 100% correct thing is to have 2 CoO


We need a minimum of 3 (better 4).
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantDvdjon
Ministry of silly walks
Registered: July 15, 2007
Norway Posts: 159
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Yes
Jon has recently watched these movies:
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorRHo
Registered: March 13, 2007
Posts: 2,759
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting schizzzo:
Quote:
Quoting Dvdjon:
Quote:
the only 100% correct thing is to have 2 CoO


We need a minimum of 3 (better 4).

And alphabetically ordered!
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar Contributorschizzzo
Registered: March 20, 2007
Germany Posts: 78
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting RHo:
Quote:
And alphabetically ordered!


Yes!!!
 Last edited: by schizzzo
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile Registrantkdh1949
Have Gun Will Travel
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 2,394
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
DEFINITELY in alphabetical order.  That would alleviate a lot of ping ponging over which should be first. I've argued this for genres, too, for a long, long time.
Another Ken (not Ken Cole)
Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges.
DVD Profiler user since June 15, 2001
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributordee1959jay
Registered: March 19, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 6,014
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Once again: if this would be implemented as a set of checkboxes like we have for Subtitles, none of this would be any problem at all. We can tick up to 32 Subtitles in alfabetical order.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributornorthbloke
Registered: March 15, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 5,459
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Dvdjon:
Quote:
it boils down to simple math... no way in hell that the very small company wingnut payed up for 80% of allmost $300 millions. sorry they made like 10 millions on frghteners. Thats why they needed new line. but who cares the only 100% correct thing is to have 2 CoO and we cant have that. So Ill yield and let you guys deside ill vote yes on nz. in short ill give up


The CoO field isn't used to record who paid for the film, it's there for who made the film - that's a very different thing.
But I also agree, multiple CoOs would be great!
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantDvdjon
Ministry of silly walks
Registered: July 15, 2007
Norway Posts: 159
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting northbloke:
Quote:
Quoting Dvdjon:
Quote:
it boils down to simple math... no way in hell that the very small company wingnut payed up for 80% of allmost $300 millions. sorry they made like 10 millions on frghteners. Thats why they needed new line. but who cares the only 100% correct thing is to have 2 CoO and we cant have that. So Ill yield and let you guys deside ill vote yes on nz. in short ill give up


The CoO field isn't used to record who paid for the film, it's there for who made the film - that's a very different thing.
But I also agree, multiple CoOs would be great!


Ok that would make alien(and many many other movies filmed in pinewood studios) english movies as the crew in this movie is mostly english and not american. twentieth century fox after all only payed for the movie and had the producers (as new line did in lotr);-) V for vendetta is another good example. oh and Mission impossible 2 would be usa hong kong(chinese) and australian hehe. Would the lord of the rings be made without new line NO actually new line took a really big risk with these movies and it was new lines decission to make it a trilogy not a 2 parter as miramax vanted. actually they wanted 1 movie and that is why new line got it and made it a trilogy.

Anyways I have given up  and said that ill vote yes next time for NZ as CoO because the most of you have pointed out that wingnut is in nz. And I have bowed for this general opinion. I just wondered why a few dvdp users has decided the movie as nz and not us when allmost everyone ive talked to list this as a hollywood movie made by PJ. Oh an d so does the american filminstitute... but you guys are rigth and all us others are wrong its as easy as that.

Multiple CoO NOW Ken with alphabetical listing !!!
Jon has recently watched these movies:
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorBad Father
Registered: July 23, 2001
Registered: March 13, 2007
Posts: 4,594
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Dvdjon:
Quote:
Quoting northbloke:
Quote:
Quoting Dvdjon:
Quote:
it boils down to simple math... no way in hell that the very small company wingnut payed up for 80% of allmost $300 millions. sorry they made like 10 millions on frghteners. Thats why they needed new line. but who cares the only 100% correct thing is to have 2 CoO and we cant have that. So Ill yield and let you guys deside ill vote yes on nz. in short ill give up


The CoO field isn't used to record who paid for the film, it's there for who made the film - that's a very different thing.
But I also agree, multiple CoOs would be great!


Ok that would make alien(and many many other movies filmed in pinewood studios) english movies as the crew in this movie is mostly english and not american. twentieth century fox after all only payed for the movie and had the producers (as new line did in lotr);-) V for vendetta is another good example. oh and Mission impossible 2 would be usa hong kong(chinese) and australian hehe. Would the lord of the rings be made without new line NO actually new line took a really big risk with these movies and it was new lines decission to make it a trilogy not a 2 parter as miramax vanted. actually they wanted 1 movie and that is why new line got it and made it a trilogy.

Anyways I have given up  and said that ill vote yes next time for NZ as CoO because the most of you have pointed out that wingnut is in nz. And I have bowed for this general opinion. I just wondered why a few dvdp users has decided the movie as nz and not us when allmost everyone ive talked to list this as a hollywood movie made by PJ. Oh an d so does the american filminstitute... but you guys are rigth and all us others are wrong its as easy as that.

Multiple CoO NOW Ken with alphabetical listing !!!


Perhaps you should change the CoO for the Alien Quadrilogy to UK. As far as I know, Brandywine Productions, Ltd. is a UK based company 
My WebGenDVD online Collection
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributornorthbloke
Registered: March 15, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 5,459
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting 8ballMax:
Quote:
Perhaps you should change the CoO for the Alien Quadrilogy to UK. As far as I know, Brandywine Productions, Ltd. is a UK based company 


We'd gladly have it! 
But Brandywine is a US company, it was just set up by Brits.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributornorthbloke
Registered: March 15, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 5,459
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Dvdjon:
Quote:
Ok that would make alien(and many many other movies filmed in pinewood studios) english movies as the crew in this movie is mostly english and not american.


No, it's got nothing to do with where the crew are from or where the filming studios are. An American company could hire an all-UK crew, but the resulting film would still get a US CoO.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorDoombear
Yosemite Sam Fan
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Canada Posts: 1,101
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Even if the program allowed for multiple CoOs, I can still see some of the people around here debating what countries, should/shouldn't be on the list for any given movie - but it would help reduce most of the ping-ponging.
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1 2 3 4  Previous   Next