No.

The use of the dividers is getting out of control

Instead of duplicating the top-billed actors at the beginning (or moving them there), I'd like to see a new checkbox similar to the uncredited and the voice only checkboxes. This way reports and movie pick could get this data while it would be much simpler to enter the data and formulate a rule.

I see that "No" votes are prevailing. Fair enough, maybe such a change would upset many people. Still, I have a feeling that the complexity of the update is being overestimated. Option #1 would mean that you copy cast members exactly as as they are: first the actors in the opening credits, then those in end credits. That's it. If there are "duplicates", it's because they are there in the credits.
It's always said that we should profile the data exactly as they are in film credits: let's do it!

As to the existent profiles (with cast from the end credits only), all you would have to do is addm, on top of it, the top-billed actors from the opening titles.

That way, you would have feature actors first, just like they are in film credits, and just like the studios wanted them, and see the cast in that order in layouts and in reports. Big names first. You would also be able to use the Movie Picker as intended, id est find movies with similarities including same top actors. Now, on the contrary, if the cast is listed in alphabetical order or in order of appearance in the end credits, we only profile it that way.

Quoting 8ballMax:

Quote:
3 to 1 against it...give it a rest already.

Actually it's less than 2 to 1 now. Of those with a preference 50 say no and 29 say yes 

Quoting 8ballMax:

Quote:
3 to 1 against it..

Nope, it's roughly 5 to 3. The majority wins, but it was worth discussing.

Quoting skipnet50:

Quote:
you can as I pointed out easily accomplish this locally, and when you upload your collection everyone will get to see what you are doing.<shakes head>

As previously stated, nobody said to upload profiles contrary to the rules.

Quoting hydr0x:

Quote:
that's because you can't or don't want to read the results correctly

51 say no to changing anything, but 63 are saying no to copying them. In the case of copying it's 63:17.

Now that's just made my brain hurt! 

Quoting EnryWiki:

Quote:
As previously stated, nobody said to upload profiles contrary to the rules.

You can upload your collection to Invelos website, you just can't contribute the change.